Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Complete
-
Affects Version/s: 1.2.3.RELEASE
-
Fix Version/s: 1.2.4.RELEASE
-
Component/s: GENERAL OBJECTS
-
Labels:None
Description
When you use in update form a datetime.tagx with pattern style "S-" for define one date and in your database have a date like xx/xx/2033 for an Object, when you try to update this record in the date input is written xx/xx/1933. If in your database have an Object with date xx/xx/1932, when you try to update this record, in the date input is written xx/xx/2032.
It seems that the date input with pattern style "S-" has a limits of years to transform a year in 1900 or 2000 and if you save the record without see this, you can lose the correct information.
Attachments
Issue Links
- relates to
-
ROO-2534 The default @DateTimeFormat with "S-" has MM/dd/yy pattern leading to a bug like Y2K
-
- Resolved
-